Sliding at the player – MLB and NCAA both make changes for 2016

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #73699
    Geoff Larsen
    Keymaster

      Essentially the new rule is that if a player is sliding at a defensive player and not the bag, then interference is called.

      These are not adopted by Softball Canada but can be used as general guidelines to whether there was “intent” for interference. If a player is sliding towards a player not within reach of the base, instead of at the base, there is likely intent to interfere..

      Here are the changed rules:

      NCAA:

      Sliding Out of Baseline

      12.13.5 The runner shall not slide out of the baseline nor slide outside her reach of the base she is attempting to slide into in order to slide directly at the fielder
      – Runner is out and ejected; return baserunners on base back to last base legally touched

      MLB:

      Rule 6.01(j) – Sliding to Bases on Double Play Attempts
      a slide to break up a double play will have to include a bona fide attempt to reach and remain on the base. Contact with the fielder is permissible, but the runner cannot change his path to initiate contact or engage in a “roll block.”

      As stated in the rule, a player performs a bona fide slide when he:

      ■ Begins his slide (makes contact with the ground) before reaching the base.

      ■ Is able and tries to reach the base with his hand or foot.

      ■ Is able and tries to remain on the base (except home plate) after completion of the slide.

      ■ Slides within reach of the base without changing his pathway for the purpose of initiating contact with a fielder.

      If the umpire determines that the runner violated this Rule 6.01(j), the umpire shall declare both the runner and batter-runner out.

      ——————–

      What do you all think? Does this change the game to drastically? Does it make the umpire’s job any easier?

      #73764
      Ian Clarke

        The MLB clarification is exactly as I have understood the rule from both my playing days (1958 to 1966), my coaching days (1986 to 1995) and my umpiring days (1990 to present). I am uncertain what the “change” is supposed to be although MLB is notoriously lax in enforcement and may simply be expecting its umpires to properly enforce this rule to reduce the injuries they have stupidly encouraged.

      Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.